hi
there, i am an unpublished poet, been writing for some
time now... i was wondering if you could help meet or
maybe give me some contacts of publishers who will be
interested in my works...i dont know why they say you've
got to be original, after all poetry is poetry, and we
can choose whichever way we like to write...so please
let me know, and are there places where poets like us
can meet and share our works with one another? {extracted from an email}
Your
feelings about your writing are understandable and more
common than you might imagine. As you say, originality is
in some sense overrated. Many good writers owe debts of
style, tone, theme, technique and form to writing they have
read, studied or otherwise encountered over the years. But
quality and good writing, however, are often underrated.
I'd define original writing as writing which provides a
new insight into an issue; a new and useful way of looking
at things differently or more deeply. A poem which alerts
the reader to something small but important in his life
which he'd forgotten and manages to move him, might be considered
as original as a 100-stanza poem without the letter "T".
Good sonnets have been written and continue to be written
well before and after the age of Shakespeare; each, however,
suggests a fresh perspective. "Fresh" is hard
to define, and a sense of it tends to emerge with years
of reading and experience, although it may not, after all
that. But it has to do with the feeling, after reading a
poem, of having learnt or understood something, or of seeing
more clearly. It's also often relative to the reader's age,
culture and frame of mind; what may seem fresh to a 16-year-old
student in Manchester might be familiar territory to a 60-year-old
woman in Beijing, and vice-versa. Nevertheless, there is
a generally agreed sense that if one is adopting a known
style or form, one's work tends to get compared to the best
traditional examples of that form, for better or worse.
Without getting into a debate on what constitutes "good"
or "bad poetry at this point, I'd also like to point
out that it's quite one thing to write good poetry and another
to expect it to be published, read or even paid for. Publishers
are commercial entities whose purpose is to market and distribute
a given work -- for profit, usually but also sometimes because
they believe in the value and quality of the work. Publishing
-- getting a work to print -- is an expensive and time-consuming
business. Understandably, many publishers are reluctant
to publish poetry and those that do are quite selective
of the kinds of work they do want to publish. Their considerations
can range from the quality (and yes, sometimes originality)
of the work to the expected size of its audience, its historical/cultural/social
importance, the reputation of the poet etc.
Because the market for poetry is woefully small at best,
hardly anyone is going to be doing it for the money; poets
(even "good" ones) therefore are always at the
bottom end of the stack when it comes to getting their works
published. C'est la vie.
There are really two broad ways around this, assuming you've
been actively rejected by all the publishers you can find
(and many publishing houses will NOT take manuscripts that
have not been referred to them by a professional reader
or agent). The first is to self-publish: basically fork
out the money and pay someone to design a book cover, print
and bind the book and put it in bookstores. Many famous
publishing houses were in fact founded this way, by the
leading writers and literary activists of their time (including
City Lights, where the Beat poets emerged).
Don't forget self-publishing online: nowadays, the web represents
a cost-effective and efficient way to get your work out
to as many people as possible: in theory, far more than
you could reach with any printed book. In a sense, getting
web-published offers you a much better chance of reaching
a receptive audience because you overcome natural barriers
to readership such as distance, time, cost, stock availability
and habit. And if your main intent in getting published
is to be read, this is a good way to go.
The second, more conventional and frankly under-valued route,
is to get your poems published in as many credible literary
journals, magazines and anthologies, on and off the web,
as you can find. Yahoo or a search engine will direct you
to a list of journals easily. Journals offer a great way
to get your best poems published (it may surprise you which
of your poems turn out to be the most well received). They
also offer a ready audience of readers who are already keyed
in to poetry -- and, if your work is accepted by journals
-- likely to be receptive to your style of writing.
Getting published in a respected journal with experienced
and well-read editors is no small feat, and you can proudly
show it off as an achievement. If you're unsuccessful, try
and try again. But if you succeed time and again, you can
be sure that you have a body of work that is of some value
and you can then bring it to the attention of a publisher,
citing all the journals/magazines/anthologies in which your
work has been accepted for publication. Indeed, that's how
professional poets in many countries earn their wings.
When approaching publishers and also anthologies/magazines/journals,
be sure to provide a short bio and if possible a sampler
of your work (10 to 20 pages but nothing more unless it
is requested), history of writing and contact details. Be
patient (don't expect instant responses) and be prepared
to take no for an answer. Not all publishers are willing
to give comments or advice on your work but it may still
be useful to ask for it. Again, be gracious if you encounter
a rejection.
Poets have a reputation of being loners and individualists
(a reputation pretty much started during the Romantic era,
even though most of the famous Romantic poets were part
of a tightly-knit clique of classically trained scholars).
But to be a poet is also to be part of a community and a
tradition of thoughtful writing, thinking and language use.
You are quite right to point out that sharing your work
in a group and getting to meet other writers is probably
a good way to get started and to figure out where you stand.
Sometimes, online literary ezines (eg. http://www.qlrs.com/forum/ <http://www.qlrs.com/forum/ ) will host forums and mailing
lists; these are where many working writers hang out, share
and discuss work, without actually meeting face-to-face.
You may want to test the waters there.
If you are based in Singapore, you might want to look up
the following reading events, publishers and journals for
starters:
Events
1. subTEXT Reading (next one is tonight Thu 6 Feb 2003),
7:30pm, The Book Café, Martin Road
2. QLRS news (http://www.qlrs.com/news.html).
A great place to find out about literary events and news
in Singapore.
3. Singapore Writers Festival (August 2003) - watch for
news of the National Arts Council's bi-annual literary
event)
Local Publishers that have released poetry
(in alpha order)
1. Ethos Books
2.
FirstFruits
3.
Landmark Books
4.
Times Publishers
Some local literary journals / e-zines
1. QUARTERLY LITERARY REVIEW SINGAPORE: http://www.qlrs.com
2.
the2ndrule: http://www.the2ndrule.com
3.
The Poetry Billboard: http://www.poetrybillboard.com
(NB:
Do look further afield; there are literally hundreds of
journals around the world that accept open submissions.
Get a copy of POET'S MARKET or check on the web)
Some highly respected foreign journals
(simply off the top of my head)
1. Poetry
2.
Ploughshares
3.
Atlanta Review
4.
Paris Review
5.
Atlantic Monthly
Most of all, good luck and keep writing!
|